On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Michael Schwendt <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Jun 2009 12:09:24 -0300, Paulo wrote: > > > I would create a symbolic link audacious -> audacious2, so the previous > > bin can still be called. > > AFAIK, this is not done in Debian/Ubuntu either. The .desktop file has > been renamed, too, and additionally the Fedora "--vendor fedora" has had > to be dropped (or else one would need to keep such patches, which deviate > from upstream, forever). The manual pages have been renamed to "audtool2" > and "audacious2". > > > I would also call the libs package libs2, so the previous lib package do > not > > need to be removed during the upgrade. > > That would create an orphan, an obsolete audacious-libs package which > is not tied to any current src.rpm package, and which could cause > problems in the future (such as unresolvable deps). > > http://mschwendt.fedorapeople.org/audacious-2.0.1-0.1.fc10.src.rpm > http://mschwendt.fedorapeople.org/audacious-plugins-2.0.1-0.3.fc10.src.rpm(updated) > > In fact, I have one: http://atrpms.net/name/mp3splt-gtk/ However, it can always be rebuilt with the new lib, which will increase the soname version. Furthermore, the source is still referencing audacious (not audacious2), and will have to be patched. -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
