Seth Vidal wrote:
Other people's noarch subpackages? Shouldn't they have obsoletes in
place, too?
I know it's hard to grok but for all intents and purposes a arch change
is A LOT like a package rename.
I like to disagree. I really see no reason why an obsolete should be needed
here. Sure there is information loss when switching to noarch and back but
an obsolete can't fix this.
I thought I had fixed the multilib behavior of yum some time ago especially
for such arch changing cases and there should be test cases covering that.
Looks like I need to have a look into it again.
Florian
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
