On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Caolán McNamara <[email protected]> wrote:
> So, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502226 was logged a > while ago against OOo for the rpms "improperly" providing and > requiring .sos that are not in the linker path, but instead in OOo's own > subdirs. > As others have mentioned, we run into this with Perl arch-specific packages quite a bit; it's hardly unique to Perl, however. I have a packaging guideline up before the FPC as to how to handle these in a sane, consistent manner: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/AutoProvidesAndRequiresFiltering Ville was kind enough to cite this guideline's alternate incarnation as a feature, as well as the thread over on the packaging list about all this (citing here just for completeness): http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.extras.packaging/5854 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/BetterRpmAutoReqProvFiltering I'd hoped this would be discussed again at yesterdays FPC meeting, but there didn't seem to be one... (Right?) -Chris -- Chris Weyl Ex astris, scientia
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
