2009/6/20 Ben Boeckel <[email protected]> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > David Nielsen wrote: > > > 2009/6/19 Peter Robinson <[email protected]> > > > >> > >> mono-tools-2.4.2-1.fc12 > >>> ----------------------- > >>> * Tue Jun 09 2009 Paul F. Johnson <p...@all-the- > johnsons.co.uk> - 2.4.2-1 > >>> - Bump to 2.4.2 preview 1 > >>> - Add support for ppc and ppc64 > >>> - Add label for udev-acl > >>> > >>> > >> is there any reason why mono doesn't use the 0.x revision > tags for > >> alpha/beta/RC releases like everyone else? > >> > > > > Plenty of projects fall outside that naming scheme, it's > unfortunate but > > that is life. Maybe upstream will consider your thoughts on > the matter if > > you bring them to their attention. > > > > - David > > > This is not an upstream issue, but a packaging one. Release: > 0.x is how you should mark prereleases so that -1 is the actual > release. > > Example: > kde-plasma-networkmanagement-0.1-0.12.20090519svn.fc11.x86_64 > > k-p-nm-0.1 can have a Release: 1 with this scheme. >
My apologies. - David
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
