That kind of metrics mean absolutely *nothing* 2009/6/29 Kevin Kofler <[email protected]>
> I wrote: > > At the rate of one update per month to every GNOME package? > > PS: Some stats: > Over the lifetime of F9 (which is now almost over, that's why I picked F9): > * libgnome was not updated a single time (!) (it was updated a single time > in F10 with 2 packaging-only changes, but never in F9). > * kdelibs was updated 18 times, the last time was 2009-06-19. > Another example (still F9): > * evince got updated a single time on 2008-06-10 (to a bugfix release). > * kdegraphics got updated 13 times, last on 2009-06-19, several of those > updates fixed bugs, added features and/or updated translations (in matching > kde-l10n updates) for Okular (the KDE equivalent of Evince), though I don't > have the exact number (due to how KDE is distributed by upstream). > > I'll stop here because I think you got the point. The stats for F10 and F11 > so far don't look much better for GNOME, and I don't think I picked the > wrong packages for a comparison. (If you think I did, feel free to suggest > others.) > > Kevin Kofler > > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list > -- Guido Grazioli <[email protected]> Via Parri 11 48011 - Alfonsine (RA) Mobile: +39 347 1017202 (10-18) Key FP = 7040 F398 0DED A737 7337 DAE1 12DC A698 5E81 2278 Linked in: http://www.linkedin.com/in/guidograzioli
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
