On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Ralf Corsepius<[email protected]> wrote: > On 08/06/2009 10:55 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >> >> On 08/06/2009 02:14 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >> >>> IMO, this feature should be scratched, because the packages in question >>> are of immature nature (... and of low packaging quality from my POV). >> >> Be specific. This is not enough information to influence the decision at >> this stage. > > OK, more verbose: > * In their present shape the packages are non-functional. According to the > submitter, this is due to lack of upstream vs. Fedora integration. > > * IM (NSH) O, the packaging quality of the submitted packages is close to > being inacceptable low.
Can you be more verbose on that one? Instead of hand waving "its low quality" -- fedora-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
