On Sun, 30 Aug 2009 07:13:54 +0000 (UTC), Elio wrote:

> Author: emaldonado
> 
> Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/nss/devel
> In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv14629
> 
> Modified Files:
>       nss.spec 
> Log Message:
> Do not require sqlite for nss, it breaks nss-util install - bug 520277
> 
> 
> Index: nss.spec
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/nss/devel/nss.spec,v
> retrieving revision 1.105
> retrieving revision 1.106
> diff -u -p -r1.105 -r1.106
> --- nss.spec  29 Aug 2009 20:46:40 -0000      1.105
> +++ nss.spec  30 Aug 2009 07:13:53 -0000      1.106
> @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
>  Summary:          Network Security Services
>  Name:             nss
>  Version:          3.12.3.99.3
> -Release:          26%{?dist}
> +Release:          27%{?dist}
>  License:          MPLv1.1 or GPLv2+ or LGPLv2+
>  URL:              http://www.mozilla.org/projects/security/pki/nss/
>  Group:            System Environment/Libraries
> @@ -14,7 +14,6 @@ Requires:         nspr >= %{nspr_version
>  Requires:         nss-util >= %{nss_util_version}
>  Requires:         nss-softokn >= %{nss_softokn_version}
>  Requires:         nss-softokn-freebl%{_isa} >= %{nss_softokn_version}
> -Requires:         sqlite

Highly questionable!

Just by watching this diff and the commit comment, it cannot fix
anything. Why? All you changed is to drop an explicit dependency on
sqlite. If sqlite breaks nss-utils, it would still be broken on
installations where sqlite is available.

So, let's visit bug 520277:

|  The two depends on libsqlite3.so() -- on 64-bit systems,
|  libsqlite3.so()(64bit) but this is not available; sqlite only provides
|  libsqlite3.so.0() and libsqlite3.so.0()(64bit)

You still have "BuildRequires: sqlite-devel", so nss does still build
with sqlite, doesn't it?

Yes, it does. The bad libsqlite3.so dependency (mentioned in the bug
report) is still present:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=1520459

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Reply via email to