On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Gregory Maxwell<[email protected]> wrote: > What would be the point of packaging something which can not operate > without codecs that fedora can not and should not ship? > That was the rationale for vagalume ending up in rpmfusion-free: the code itself is fully free, but it's not usable without some patent-encumbered codecs.
By that rationale, though, shouldn't totem-youtube end up in rpmfusion-free too? Regards, -- Michel Alexandre Salim -- fedora-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
