Dave Airlie <airlied <at> redhat.com> writes:
> On Thu, 2009-09-10 at 21:27 +0000, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > Although it obviously would have been far nicer to have had this all in
> > the mass rebuild, there were multiple test builds against rawhide packages.
> > I
> > did a build of the rawhide kernel package using jakub's gcc-vta and lxo used
> > that to post results of testing to the gcc list, which helped get it
> > accepted
> > upstream, which is a requirement for it to make it into fedora, etc.
> > Sorry, this wasn't more visible.
>
> Wierdly the first package that broke when this was pushed was the
> kernel
Yes :{ Which does proof Jesse's point of course.
There is no substitute for just dumping the code into rawhide
to give it a thorough testing... The original plan
Jakub had was to do a complete out-of-repo mass-rebuild before
adding it, but ran out of time, so that would have made it hit
rawhide even later... And Alex has been fast fixing any issues.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
