On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 01:59:57PM -0700, Nathanael Noblet wrote:
> Hello,
> So I recently posted my first package and the review. While I waited I
> started cleaning up more issues I found after I realized you could run
> rpmlint on the actual rpm and not just the spec file. I'd like the review to
> go as quickly as possible so I'm just trying to get all those warnings
> cleaned up.
>
> My package has a number of sub packages for various backend drivers. These
> subpackages basically contain a .so file for the most part however I'm
> getting rpmlint messages as follows
>
> libdspam.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libdspam.so
You should also see if you can build the app such that it installs its
private plugins in a subdir of %{_libdir} rather than
clutter up %{_libdir} with libraries that nothing else can use.
Thanks,
Matt
--
Matt Domsch
Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO
linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
