On 11/16/2009 12:37 AM, Arthur G wrote:
Hi anyonewhocanhelp,
Just curious, is libc now an explicit dependency or should I buy a sense
of humour?
broken dependencies in the development tree:
On ppc:
xmlfy-1.5.0-1.fc12.ppc requires libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)
xmlfy-1.5.0-1.fc12.ppc requires libc.so.6
....etc
Everyone is getting these emails, therefore I assumed it would be fixed
by someone other than the package maintainers :)
Jeff
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
