On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kof...@chello.at>wrote:
> Gregory Maxwell wrote: > > I noticed that http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora appears to be > > strongly promoting i386 Fedora over x86_64. Is this intentional or an > > oversight? > > This is, sadly, intentional. I and others have been complaining about this > for months, we got ignored, all in the names of making things work for > people who are not smart enough to figure out whether their computer is 64- > bit or not. The argument that almost all new non-netbook machines are > 64-bit > anyway also got ignored. > > IMHO, the right solution is to make the 64-bit edition the default download > and to work on making the error message people get when trying to install > it > on a 32-bit machine nicer: "We're sorry, but your computer is too old to > install this 64-bit version of Fedora. Please download the legacy 32-bit > edition instead." > > Kevin Kofler > > Is it right to call 32-bit legacy though? As it is, the Intel architecture doesn't seem like a true 64-bit architecture. It seems more like it extends the 32-bit arch and wraps 64-bitness around it. In any case, 32-bit shouldn't be considered legacy until every type of computer sold is 64-bit. And the fact is, that isn't true. Netbooks are entirely 32-bit currently, and a majority of low end desktops are still 32-bit only.
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
