> Kyle Tucker wrote:
> > But recent research into LDIF revealed that the proper way 
> 
> What do you mean by "recent" here?  RFC 2849 was published in 2000, and 
> I don't think there was much further research.  That document illustrate 
> even wiser (and syntactically correct) means to perform the 
> modifications you need.

I was referring to my research. I was more looking into why the other
non-replace method works, if it was some optional syntax or if it wasn't
even working as it seemed, although all evidence I saw indicated it was.

-- 
- Kyle 

--
Fedora-directory-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users

Reply via email to