Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Hard to read arabic fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439421 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |9 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[EMAIL PROTECTED], | |[EMAIL PROTECTED] ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-14 04:22 EST ------- Changing version to '9' as part of upcoming Fedora 9 GA. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-11 03:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > So I removed one package then the other it looks like I was complaining about > kacst-fonts, paktype-fonts is a little better since it is not bold but it is > still not as good as the font used in f7. That is the font used in standard > print (newspapers, books, etc) Hmm, I wonder what font you miss from F7? I am not aware of any changes for Arabic since then, except that the fonts were moved to separate packages are Rahul explained. Perhaps you could try fonts-arabic from f7 again and see if that makes a difference: since the paths to the fonts changed and might potentially have affected the priorities. Should we make kacst-fonts optional for Arabic? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
