Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477397 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot <[email protected]> 2008-12-21 15:32:49 EDT --- Thinking about it some more, the correct plan for the htmldoc packager(s) is probably: 1. long-term: ask upstream to move to fontconfig/freetype/pango/cairo 2. short-term: * ask upstream what its original font sources were * if those fonts exist in type1 form in Fedora, link them from here * if those fonts do not exist in type1 form in Fedora, but have some other canonical type1 source, package this source properly * if they're strictly an htmldoc production, and have no other proper source (and it can be acertained no license was hurt during their production) package them as htmldoc sub-packages (one per font family). Assuming upstream was smart enough to use its own font names and didn't re-use the name of someone else's font (in which case the fonts need to be rename or they'll conflict with the real fonts). The subpackage logic can be taken from /etc/rpmdevtools/spectemplate-fonts-multi.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
