Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477055 --- Comment #8 from Nicolas Mailhot <[email protected]> 2008-12-29 05:14:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > To summarize, in a nutshell, what I could work from is if I get: > > a) Confirmation that there are two font spec templates, > /etc/rpmdevtools/spectemplate-fonts-{multi,single}.spec, and this is how it's > going to stay in the foreseeable future. We will keep two templates as long as no one finds a clean way to address both use cases with a single template. Realistically, since changing all the font packages in the distro to new guidelines is a lot of work, this won't happen before the F12 cycle (and probably not even then since no one has proposed new bright ideas so far) > b) Confirmation that the token in both of the above to be replaced with the > font "basename" is exactly "<FONTNAME>" (sans quotes), and this is how it's > going to stay in the foreseeable future. The templates are not intended to be changed now that the review phase is closed, the templates are documented in the wiki and many packagers have already converted to them (of course minimal bug-fixing will occur if people find problems but so far no one has complained about this part) > Please provide answers to these ASAP, we're starting to be a bit in a hurry to > get the next rpmdevtools out. I hope those answers are satisfactory. I won't have much internet access before 2009 sorry :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
