Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477427 Jon Ciesla <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |needinfo?(nicolas.mail...@l | |aposte.net) --- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla <[email protected]> 2008-12-31 11:35:54 EDT --- Moodle's fonts are these: ./lang/sm_utf8/fonts/default.ttf ./lang/km_utf8/fonts/default.ttf ./lang/to_utf8/fonts/default.ttf ./lib/default.ttf The first three are already in language pack subpackages, and the last is apparently custom and not provided elsewhere, AFAICT. It's also only 503k. I understand and support both the new font guidelines and the reasons for them, but is a subpackage really the best solution here? If it were more fonts, I'd just do it, but I question the utility for one file. Would it be sufficient for me to document my reasoning in the spec and close the bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
