Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336 Nicolas Mailhot <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(nicolas.mail...@l | |aposte.net) | --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot <[email protected]> 2009-01-12 18:30:06 EDT --- You need to use the %_font_pkg macro http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#What_is_a_compliant_font_.28sub.29package.3F I'm sure this will make your task easier and simplify your spec considerably For examples, see the dejavu, vera, mgopen, abyssinica etc packages As for the naming, my suggested guideline is http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#How_should_I_name_my_fonts_.28sub.29package.28s.29.3F but FPC is discussing changes to it. spot has probably the best view on what the final rules are likely to be. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
