Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483363 Nicolas Mailhot <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[email protected] |[email protected] Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot <[email protected]> 2009-01-31 04:21:23 EDT --- Nothing much to say, this is a textbook simple font package that closely follows the template. Best practice nowadays is to use a summary that does not include the font name. Also, it seems there is a little more info on the font history in upstream's web page, it's always good to include it in description as long as it's limited to a few paragraphs. But all of this is nitpicking, the package itself is sane ⩐⩐⩐ APPROVED ⩐⩐⩐ I'll sponsor you so you can continue from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a as soon as I see one or two other clean package submissions from you. Thank you for packaging a new font for Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
