Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477383 Nils Philippsen <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(fedora-fonts-bugs | |[email protected]) --- Comment #10 from Nils Philippsen <[email protected]> 2009-02-19 05:38:41 EDT --- After I got fontforge working (bug #466404 and bug #450709), I looked into the font metadata: It says that the font family is "PaperCuts 2.0". Would the resultant, compliant package name be "extremetuxracer-papercuts2_0-fonts"? Two font files are included which have the same font in what I think is bold and outline weight. Still, the outline file says it is "bold" in its metadata. Should I fix this? Can you help me to do this properly? The license for both files is this: - "Names/Copyright": "Made for ETR by cpicon92. Based on Paper Cuts Daniel Poeira, licensed under the GPL. Czech alphabet and U+00A0, U+2009 and U+202f by Petr Pisar, 2007." - "TTF Names/License": "The use of this font is granted subject to GNU General Public License." - "TTF Names/Descriptor": "A combination of Free Sans Bold Oblique and Paper Cuts, made by cpicon92 for Extreme Tux Racer" I know that GPL isn't an ideal license for a font, but is that acceptable? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
