Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477374





--- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot <[email protected]>  2009-02-20 
12:42:31 EDT ---
@oron

(In reply to comment #8)
>  * Someone called my name ;-) [yes, I'm the slow Hebrew l10n coordinator]
>  * As for naming:

Actually the problem is not the naming, we have pretty clear naming rules
nowadays, the problem are the summaries/descriptions that need help from people
who actually use the fonts to become useful to new users

@rahul

1. I'm 100% sure we'll have less maintenance load long term if all our font
packages use the same kind of fontconfig rules

2. I think you misunderstood the Obsoleting stuff. The aim is not to have
compat obsolete the new packages which should be fine, the aim is to have it
obsolete the pre-split culmus-fonts < 0.101-6 to have yum update it
automatically

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

Reply via email to