Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 Akira TAGOH <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?([email protected]) | --- Comment #43 from Akira TAGOH <[email protected]> 2009-04-30 01:08:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #41) > the key difference is not to separate them from the standard fontconfig files, > but to make only one set of files linked under a given locale. sure you > probably don't not necessarily follow ubuntu's way, but the idea, a (set of) > locale-specific fontconfig settings is missing for cjk in fedora (at least for > ja). Yes, I know. and fontconfig is capable to do that with the language-specific overrides rule. it can constructs the font list from them and works similarly unless the simple priority list rule prevents. > then please propose a better solution, which can avoid overriding in both > ways. I do ;) can you point out any cases that the language-specific overrides rule doesn't work instead? I should asked you same question but I didn't get the certain reply for my comment #34 yet though. > can you explain what do you mean by "simple priority list"? are you referring > to 65-nonlatin? or are you referring to font-specific config files? if it is > the latter case, we are talking about the same thing. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips#Simple_priority_lists We are talking about the same thing? I don't think so since you apparently dislikes it and you are proposing to do that outside fontconfig for single language but not to make happier with all of CJK and non-CJK languages with English locale say at once. (In reply to comment #42) > and also can you tell me why you can not the following config file to > vlgothic-fonts to make it a preferred fonts for ja locale? Sorry? can you point out what's difference between the above and current vlgothic-fonts' config? it looks similar to me except it's provided separately because those are subpackaged. and I don't really like to contain the font name not owned. > <?xml version="1.0"?> > <!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "fonts.dtd"> > <fontconfig> > <alias> > <family>sans-serif</family> > <prefer> > <family>DejaVu Sans</family> > <family>Bitstream Vera Sans</family> > <family>VL PGothic</family> > </prefer> > </alias> > <alias> > <family>monospace</family> > <prefer> > <family>DejaVu Sans Mono</family> > <family>Bitstream Vera Sans Mono</family> > <family>VL Gothic</family> > </prefer> > </alias> > </fontconfig> Whether or not this works properly really depends on the order of the config files, which isn't the right direction to go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
