Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 --- Comment #32 from Akira TAGOH <[email protected]> 2009-05-12 00:55:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #31) > I don't think so. I am not saying this must be included in fontconfig upstream > (which get updated slowly), we can certainly create a new package which only > include these CJK specific config files. Even fontconfig have similar files, > we > can still ship something to override if it gets updated. But the key idea is > not to let individual font to do this. Functional-wise, they are completely > equivalent. I have never been saying about fontconfig upstream but the centralized management is painful to maintain. > Either way does not prevent people from customizing their own list. As I said, > they are simply equivalent. Sure. so how is it better than applying it with the package installation then? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
