Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507261 --- Comment #4 from Takanori MATSUURA <[email protected]> 2009-06-22 02:07:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) Hmm, I can now see both "4 fonts package" and separate zip archive are available from the official site. I have never found separate zip archives in early time when IPA font 00301 has been released. In this case, do we have to separate ghostscript files if we will fix bug 507262 with my suggestion? It's too inconvenience. Number 1 of "Package layout for fonts" in the URL mentioned in comment #3 should be updated like the following: Fonts released upstream in separate archives MUST be packaged in separate source packages (src.rpm), unless they belong to the same font family. If fonts released upstream are also released as a merged archive, this rule will not applied. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
