Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477371 --- Comment #23 from Nicolas Mailhot <[email protected]> 2009-06-24 16:17:12 EDT --- 1. you forgot to remove the %dir %{_fontdir} line (though at this stage it's harmless, just spec pollution) 2. Please use a fontconfig prefix in the 60-64 range, 50 would be a high-priority font ("fantasy" can be pretty much anything, but it'd be a shame to put a font with no bold and no italic first) 3. is there a reason you only use half of /usr/share/fontconfig/templates/basic-font-template.conf ??? I know the two blocks in there seem very similar, but they have different affects and are not redundant. 4. you should put data_README.txt as doc in both packages, since it covers licensing for files that will end up in cave9-mutante-fonts and cave9 packages Though 1 and 4 do not precisely concern the font subpackage, so you may ignore me there :p I'm a terrible perfectionist. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
