Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507637 --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot <[email protected]> 2009-06-29 03:46:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > I am thinking if I should apply for making cjkuni-fonts into > cjkuni-uming-fonts > and cjkuni-ukai-fonts as they have two separated source tarball now? If upstream releases the fonts in separate tarballs now and if that can simplify the specs this is certainly the right thing to do (this is why guidelines recommend splitting) Experience shows maintenance of complex multi-spec fonts is a lot more expensive than that of simple spec files. > Also, the font.{dir,scale} generated are not right (missing iso8859-13). There > are scale.{dir,scale} provided inside the tarballs. I am still trying to > contact upstream about this issue. mkfontdir & friends have always been unreliable and broken. core fonts usage just needs to die, it is pretty much hopeless reliability-wise. Therefore it's usually a better investment to ask people who complain of core fonts brokeness to port their apps to fontconfig than try to fix a system that has been failing consistently for more than a decade -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
