Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481068 --- Comment #11 from Nicolas Mailhot <[email protected]> 2009-09-22 01:55:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #8) > > 2. a foo-fangsong-ti-fonts subpackage, > bitmap-cjk-fonts has only fansongti fonts file, should we change it name? > like bitmap-cjk-fangsongti-fonts I'd not mention the cjk bit at all > > Also > > - it would be probably cleaner to package the ucs fonts in a ucs-fixed-fonts > > package instead of hiding their origin in a collection package > > can you elaborate more on this, which font exactly? The readme says fixed is a copy of http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/ucs-fonts.html If we packaged it today it'd end up in a ucs-fonts or ucs-fixed-fonts srpm, not something else entirely. Also as Jens wrote we need to de-duplicate with xorg-x11-fonts, but xorg-x11-fonts is another package that needs reorganisation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
