Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529594 --- Comment #19 from Nicolas Mailhot <[email protected]> 2009-10-20 07:54:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > FWIW it would be better looking back all of the fontconfig file available in > Fedora now for Fedora 13 and correct as needed to be sane. Sure it would be better; but I don't have the cycles myself. All I can do right now is to try to make sure no new dubious files make it in the distro. The basic rule is: if a fontconfig pattern is not documented in fontpackages-devel it is wrong for Fedora, and no pattern gets in fontpackages-devel without approval from Behdad and eventually discussion on the fonts list. That's the only way to make everyone converge and avoid different packagers making conflicting decisions. In an ideal world someone would write the xslt rules to check that existing files conform to documented patterns, and integrate them in repo-font-audit (and packagers would actually act on repo-font-audit reports). Also, it would be nice if somehow wrote a xslt script or another command that actually displayed in human-readable form the priority stack configured on a system (fc-list output unfortunately depends on the fonts installed on-system, so depending on local fonts the same conf will yield different results. Which is not a way to do reliable QA) Interested people can send me fontpackages patches or ask for fontpackages git access. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
