Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532237 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <[email protected]> 2009-11-04 04:28:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Hmm, weird. so the suggestion from nim-nim on the package review was wrong and > the priority on our fontconfig l10n template won't effects reversely? Unless fontconfig changed its behaviour my advice was correct. *However* it is only correct if the other packages you interact with limit themselves to the few audited fontconfig patterns. If they start being creative (and fontconfig gives people a *lot* of room to be creative) all bets are of. I've almost given up on CJK font packages. At this stage if CJK packagers do not get together to agree on a common way to use fontconfig (and have Behdad proof it) there is no way to progress. Right now it's a "you have packaged a CJK font; go directly to bugzilla" http://journal.paul.querna.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/monopoly-go-to-jail-card.jpg -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
