On 2009-01-28 at 8:41:39 -0500, "Nicolas Mailhot" <[email protected]> wrote: > However if you don't you'll have to deal with the directory ownership > of the common font directory (I purposefully didn't want to open this > particular can of worm) and other common files. > > Also documentation can be bulky, especially when upstream provides in > in pdf or .doc form with embedded bitmaps of what the font looks like.
Well, it seems like there wouldn't be much of a case to obsolete -common in that scenario, just move the license into each subpackage. ~spo _______________________________________________ Fedora-fonts-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-list
