Rahul Sundaram wrote: > True but there is value in gather ideas beyond what we have already > thought about since the concern about the long review queue is a ongoing > thing. FESCo mentioned review-o-matic briefly recently as well
I see enough examples of 'paralysis by over-analysis' first hand to be wary of gathering ideas without having a tinker toy. Having a tangible prototype allows for a better discussion, but /me talking more on this would be bikeshedding. In the end it is the decision of the developers/contributors/participants in the project whether there needs to be a long running idea gathering phase (which would then imply that the current comprehension of the scope as defined by the established guidelines is vaporware) -- http://www.gutenberg.net - Fine literature digitally re-published http://www.plos.org - Public Library of Science http://www.creativecommons.org - Flexible copyright for creative work _______________________________________________ Fedora-india mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-india
