So, here's another question? What stops events from being organized with more agility? For example, (ripping an idea from Susmit) - following up an install fest with a much tightly focussed event aimed at discussing tasks and self assigning owners? Would that kickstart a cycle of more involvement?
~s On 3/22/09, Dipanjan Chakraborty <[email protected]> wrote: > I have a different question : given that we'd like repeat runs of >> Activity Days at places where they have been held once, would it be a >> good idea to think of what can be done to help build an infrastructure >> that facilitates that as opposed to doing up an Event Box ? > > > I think this calls for distributed and localised Event Boxes, or > infrastructure. This may also reduce the problem of returning the boxes to > an extent. > >> >> >> At this point, I'd like to know what steps are being planned at places >> where Activities have happened ie. what next beyond the first Install >> Fest ? How do you plan to chart out the first steps to contribution ? > > Yes, this needs to be thought about. In my LUG what I have observed is the > events are so widely spaced in time that the people loose interest in the > mean time. Our problem lies in balancing academic activities with these > events. > > > > -- > Yours sincerely, > Dipanjan Chakraborty > -- Sent from my mobile device http://www.gutenberg.net - Fine literature digitally re-published http://www.plos.org - Public Library of Science http://www.creativecommons.org - Flexible copyright for creative work _______________________________________________ Fedora-india mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-india
