On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 13:26 +0530, sankarshan wrote: > On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Ankur Sinha<[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 11:15 +0530, sankarshan wrote: > >> On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Ankur Sinha<[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > This is because everyone that requests a media does not turn into a > >> > local contact. The media is not following the "receiver becomes donor" > >> > scheme that we want it to. > >> > >> We never did visualize the "receiver becomes donor" way of paying it > >> forward. The idea was to de-lineate the LocalContacts from the "free" > >> FreeMedia aspect. Which in plain terms means that the LCs should be > >> able to project that they are charging for the media. > > > > I don't understand the last sentence. "project that they are charging > > for the media" meaning? > > The LocalContacts should be able to represent with clarity that they > are/would be charging for the media is probably an apt way to phrase > that sentence. > > /sankarshan >
The essential clarification needed is whether they would charge only the cost of media + postage or would there also be a "service charge"? -- regards, Ankur _______________________________________________ Fedora-india mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-india
