Bill Nottingham wrote:
Dimitris Glezos ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
Our translators have made it clear they want to use a SCM for the translations
and said an *additional* web-based tool would be nice. So, let's first create
our SCM and we'll see about whether we should use pootle.
Use *one* SCM. How to gate currently hosted GIT/HG/etc into this is
unclear. :/
I'm not sure either, I'll take smolt as an example. I want smolt to be
translated, I won't be translating it because I am not multi-lingual.
If the translations project had a set of rules / policies "You want
translations, do this this and this, host your project here in this
repo" Then I'd gladly migrate from hg to cvs or whatever they
requested. How is this type of thing being done now and for how many
projects?
-Mike
_______________________________________________
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
