Mike McGrath wrote:
Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 12:02:20 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 22:47:20 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 22:08:12 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
$ rpm -q python-kid
python-kid-0.9-2.centos4
on buildsys.fedoraproject.org would benefit from an update to
0.9.5 which
includes xml related fixes and makes it possible to create pages
that
don't fail in the w3c validator.
$ rpm -q --whatrequires python-kid
repoview-0.5.1-1.centos4
http://home.arcor.de/ms2002sep/tmp/el4-extras/noarch/python-kid-0.9.5-0.1.el4.noarch.rpm
Source rpms and build requirements here:
http://home.arcor.de/ms2002sep/tmp/el4-extras/
I'm not sure I fully understand what problem this solves. Can you
give me an example?
Sure. It's
http://tinyurl.com/2pc37j
versus
http://tinyurl.com/2wdk5s
The former was created with unmodified software on buildsys.f.o,
while the
latter was created with my modified repoview including an updated
python-kid.
So, what is the formal procedure for requesting a package update on the
buildsys server like described above and getting an official and final
reply?
Get someone upstream (RHEL) to accept the package changes. buildsys
is going away in days anyway after koji goes live.
It's bad form to ignore one person and ask the same of others. We've
said no. You didn't convince us. Sorry. You showed me that its
creating mal-formed XML. It always has, no one has brought it up. I
even gave you list of steps to do to get it updated. Exactly what
issues is this causing you in your use of the buildsys?
-Mike
_______________________________________________
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
