On Wed, 01 Aug 2007 11:37:28 -0400 seth vidal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> what the purpose of hosting a non-upstream repo? For a fork of it? > That's kinda antithetical to fedora in general, isn't it? Collaboration between more than 1 or 2 people on a patch set to propose upstream. That said, depending on the scm, fairly easy to clone an upstream, make initial changes, rsync to fedorapeople. Other people can clone from that, owner can merge in changes from them, etc... The only real thing missing is managing multiple people having write access. Is that really a huge deal if each of these spinoffs have a commit master that pulls from people's changes and merges them into the repo? -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
