On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 12:16 -0500, Jeremy Katz wrote: > On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 11:46 -0500, seth vidal wrote: > > the importance order is something separate. I was just listing the > > service so we can create interdependency charts. > > > > fo example: mirrormanager is useless w/o fas :) > > The managemetn side of mirrormanager is. But the "serve out the > existing mirror information" side is perfectly fine without FAS (and > realistically, is the part that more of us think of when we think MM)
in my mind: mirrormanger - the management side mirrorlist - the actual mirrorlists -sv _______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
