On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, Ricky Zhou wrote:
> On 2009-04-29 11:23:55 PM, Matt Domsch wrote:
> > Can I reverse the question? Instead of a pam_fas module, what about
> > creating a way to export FAS information as LDAP, such that all
> > LDAP-consuming apps would "just work", albeit not able to access the
> > FAS-specific information?
> I agree with this approach. In some distant future version of FAS, I'd
> like to play with the idea of storing the data in LDAP while handling
> our group sponsorship system in postgres.
>
Ick
-Mike
_______________________________________________
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
