On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 05:08:03PM -0400, Mike McLean wrote: > On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 12:41 AM, Dennis Gilmore <[email protected]> wrote: > > The daemon distinction might be wrong thing to fixate on here. There > is nothing in that distinction that should exclude python (or most any > language). I think the real factors of concern are: size, complexity, > speed, system load, robustness, and security. > <nod> By and large I agree with you. One thing further to think about is that becoming dependent on a tool written in an interpreted language means that you need to install that language on your system and may become tied to a specific version of that language. In theory, this shouldn't be worse than tying yourself to a specific C library but in practice I've found that parallel installing interpreters and their libraries is a lot less supported than parallel installing a C lib.
Using python in Fedora Infrastructure probably isn't too big a deal as we have abundant python programmers here to port things forward if the main developers don't but it is something to consider with other languages or in other environments. -Toshio
pgphNJhXYnri1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
