On 02/15/2018 01:17 PM, Brian Exelbierd wrote: > == Changing metadata > > Modify the table that drives fedoraproject.org/easyfix that is located at > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Easyfix > > The table would now include two additional columns (optional) > > Col 1 = existing reference to the issue tracker. We should consider adding > gitlab.com support > Col 2 = existing point of contact > Col 3 = category of task (documentation, infrastructure, programming-Haskell, > programming-Ruby, etc.) > Col 4 = SIG/WG/etc. this project is related too (Design, Council, KDE, etc.) >
I like this page structure. I see it as more engaging to the people reading the page too. Given some time to research it, I think this is something that we could work on in CommOps. > == Changing fedoraproject.org/easyfix > > Today we show only two categories: Issues from Pagure/Github and Bugzillas > > I believe those categories are not the right categories for consumers of the > page. Using the new category (col 3) above, we would break things out by the > kind of contribution. This would serve to let people browse related tasks > more easily and to reduce the overwhelming nature of the current lists. > +1. > = WCIDFF > > WCDIFF should be extended to show the categories and groups appropriate for > the various endpoints. This way the person who navigates WCDIFF has the > option of reading a specific task they could work on right now, if they so > desire. > I've wanted this functionality for a long time but needs dedicated development time full-time. If not, then an active effort is needed to create a roadmap with easyfixes rolled in to attract contributors. In retrospect, all of this sounds like a good GSoC proposal. Not sure if it's too late to expand on the idea and find a mentor for it. > = Marketing/Promotion > > The categories give us the opportunity to promote our easyfixes as a great > way to join or contribute in a targeted manner. > +1. Super helpful for writing even outside of the Fedora community or for anyone that wants to highlight a call to action to participate. > What do people think? > I'm interested in all the above, but skeptical to whether all pieces are solvable by CommOps. -- Cheers, Justin W. Flory [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ fedora-join mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
