> Just realized it looks like you also snuck in a kernel-PAE-debug build
> variant... ;) Damn, it'd be nice if koji could spread kernel variant
> builds of the same arch across multiple builders...
I didn't add it, it was already there. I just made it uniform with the
others. Maybe the hand-editted duplication had left it not working? Or
not entirely removed when it was intended to be?
> Some of the documentation about what the -s and -r flags represent in
> the %kernel_variant_post would probably be worth adding though (just
> says [-s <s> -r <r>] right now in the comment header, and my best guess
> is s=string, r=replacement).
Yeah, it forms a sed s command.
> Only other thing I'm seeing right now, though its probably been this way
> forever, is that we're a bit inconsistent about whether we use %{name}
> or just 'kernel' in %package and %description.
That matters when doing the variant-source packages like kernel-vanilla,
which I haven't tested lately. For the "install the kernel-foo package"
parts of %description, %{name}-foo might be better since it will make the
literal instructions match the intended reality for that case.
For the provides/requires some are intended to be %{name} and some kernel.
i.e., %{name}-debuginfo-common-%{_target_cpu}, but kernel-drm.
Thanks,
Roland
_______________________________________________
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
