On 25.03.2008 13:47, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Tuesday 25 March 2008 02:02:04 am Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 24.03.2008 20:53, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Monday 24 March 2008 03:32:37 pm Dave Jones wrote:
I took a stab at bz 197065 and arrived at the patch below.
Would appreciate some eyeballs before I commit from people
familiar with the macro goo in the specfile. (Hi Roland!)
[...]
- install -m 644 .config $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/boot/config-$KernelVer
- install -m 644 System.map
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/boot/System.map-$KernelVer - touch
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/boot/initrd-$KernelVer.img
+ install -m 644 .config
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/boot/config-$KernelVer.%{_arch} + install -m 644
System.map $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/boot/System.map-$KernelVer.%{_arch} +
touch $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/boot/initrd-$KernelVer.img.%{_arch}
For the sake of consistency, [...]
For the sake of consistency we IMHO should use the same delimiter
between "$(uname -r)" and arch in all places. E.g. either "." (like
quoted above) everywhere or a "-", like we already use in the devel
packages (e.g. /usr/src/kernels/2.6.25-0.141.rc6.git5.fc9-x86_64).
One thing I like about using "." over "-" is that you'd get
2.6.25-xzy.fc9.x86_64 for uname -r output, which matches up nicely with what
rpm -q outputs, now that we're defaulting to outputting n-v-r.arch.
Sounds good. Or, IOW: I'm fine with using "." as delimiter, if we use it
for the directories found in the devel packages as well.
This whole idea of course means that there are some adjustments needed
for kmods in livna (or other kernel module packaging schemes). That
shouldn't be to hard; doing it for F9 might be a bit late, but if you
guys really want to go that route I'm sure we'll find a way to deal with
it before F9 ships.
CU
knurd
_______________________________________________
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
