Agreed, Supper netting. Some times referred to as sleepless nights, Lost weekends and job security.
Regards Ray On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 14:11 -0800, Wayne Feick wrote: > On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 21:29 +0000, Ray Ward wrote: > > > One further bit of information. While brushing up on IP I found > > this. > > > > Definition: The IP address 192.168.1.0 represents the 192.168.1.x > > range of addresses where x is between 1 and 255. 192.168.1.0 is a > > private IP network. It is the default network (but not the default > > address) for Linksys brand home broadband routers. > > > > 192.168.1.0 is not a valid IP address for a network router or other > > host, and no device on your network should be configured to own this > > address. Instead, 192.168.1.0 is used in routing tables and by the > > Internet Protocol internally to identify the 192.168.1.x network as > > a whole. A router or other network gateway device on these networks > > is typically installed at 192.168.1.1, and other hosts use higher > > numbers in the range. > > > > At this point I would recommend changing the routers address. > > Just to clarify things a little, many (most?) TCP/IP implementations > allow for the 0 address in a subnet to be used as a valid IP address. > If you see 192.168.1.0 on its own, it's most likely an IP address. If > it's paired with 255.255.255.0 as a network mask, or has a /24 on the > end of it, then it's a network. It's also possible (even common) for > that network is subdivided into multiple smaller networks (e.g. /28). > > The suggestion to try 192.168.1.1 instead of 192.168.1.0 is > reasonable, though. > > Wayne. >
_______________________________________________ Fedora-laptop-list mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-laptop-list
