On Oct 21, 2005, at 5:46 PM, Axel Thimm wrote:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 11:53:45AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
I never did like all the extra repo files for each repository. I
liked
the idea of one file per family, so there was one file for say
freshrpms, one for atrpms, one for extras, one for core/updates,
one for
Legacy. Each having sub-repos such as testing/devel/whatever. But
thats just my opinion. Easier to edit one file than 4. Fedora
steering
folks tell me that I can go w/ what I prefer. Thoughts?
I agree. Modularity is nice, and when sometimes missed too much,
people then tend to have each configuration line in a separate file :)
I'd even go as far as declare legacy as part of core/updates. In fact
that's how ATrpms distributes yum/smart/apt configuration
bits. core/updates/legacy (including disabled *-testing bits) are all
in a "base" config file.
I'm not sure I understand quite what you mean by the 2nd paragraph...
Anyway, here's an updated package with two main changes:
1) all repos live in one file - fedora-legacy.repo
2) file is marked as config(noreplace) in the RPM
http://www.cs.ucsb.edu/~jeff/legacy/legacy-yumconf-3-2.fc3.src.rpm
Spec: http://www.cs.ucsb.edu/~jeff/legacy/legacy-yumconf-2.spec
-Jeff
--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
