Jesse Keating wrote:

When no epoch is present, 0 is assumed.  Adding epoch 0 shouldn't break
anything.  Please try this and test within a chroot?

Not with rh73's version of rpm. Epoch-less packages are the equivalent of Epoch -1 (ie, Epoch: 0 trumps a lack of Epoch).

-- Rex

--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list

Reply via email to