Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Marc Deslauriers wrote:You think?. I am not so sure they are well documented at all and Debian says on http://qa.debian.org/ "We know that, at the moment, there is no real quality assurance for Debian, in a conventional meaning of that term". Feel free to look for better QA processes than Fedora legacy within the community distributions and suggest ideas.On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 14:44 -0600, Mike McCarty wrote:Since Legacy is no longer in my yum configuration, it's no longer an issue for me, good or bad. I don't wish to subscribe to "testing". Since "testing" and "release" have been merged, I have unsubscribed from "release". If the security notices on FC2 get severe enough, I'll just move on to CentOs, Scientific Linux, or Debian. Since I'm already helping administer a Debian box, it might make sense to move to that.Just out of curiosity, what are the Debian, CentOS and Scientific Linux QA procedures? Maybe Fedora Legacy could use some of them to get FL releases up to their standards. They do have documented QA procedures, right?
Yes, my indictment earlier was for *all* distributions of Linux.
But Legacy has gone further than I can follow along, that's all.
Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!
--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
