Let's not forget that we have a new way of marking bugs as security issues.
There
is no longer a severity of "Security," but now "Security" is one of the Bugzila
Keywords (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/describekeywords.cgi).
-David
----- Original Message -----
From: "Matthew Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Discussion of the Fedora Legacy Project" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 9:31 PM
Subject: Re: Fedora Core 4 coming . . . sunset,infrastructure issues . . .
meeting?
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 09:54:57PM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > > Anyone have any opinion on this?
> > I would think be clear that we're interested only in security related bugs.
>
> Yeah. Last time I actually went through the open security bugs and moved
> them to Legacy myself where appropriate; I'll probably do that again. I'll
> also look closely at those marked critical. The rest got this message:
>
> Fedora Core 2 is now maintained by the Fedora Legacy project for security
> updates only. If this problem is a security issue, please reopen and
> reassign to the Fedora Legacy product. If it is not a security issue and
> hasn't been resolved in the current FC3 updates or in the FC4 test
> release, reopen and change the version to match.
>
> Which I'd plan to do again, with of course FC2 -> FC3/4, FC3 -> FC5, and FC4
> test -> FC6 test.
>
> As before, I'll add myself to the CC list of each bug and help deal with
> anything that is stirred up, as of course the intent is cleanup, not more
> mess.
>
>
> --
> Matthew Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] <http://mattdm.org/>
> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/>
>
> --
> fedora-legacy-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
>
--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
