Orcan Ogetbil <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes but you are missing one thing. The library is LGPLv2. It is not LGPLv2+. > Doesn't it make the resultant binary GPLv2, without the + ?
There is nothing in the GPL that requires you to put binaries under GPL. In fact, you can't even do this in many cases. You just need to follow the conditions in section 3 for the binary. If you ever like to convert LGPLv2 code to GPL, you of course cannot convert it to GPLv2+ but only to GPLv2. Jörg -- EMail:[email protected] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin [email protected] (uni) [email protected] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily _______________________________________________ Fedora-legal-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list
