Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
Douglas McClendon wrote:
Douglas McClendon wrote:
Theoretical Workaround #1-5
-------------------------
Just curious; I like what I'm reading, although I do not follow some
parts of the theoretical workarounds, but: Is there any particular use
case for all of this? I'm asking, because the only thing I can think of,
it's all this work being done to prevent a user's "5-min-avg-uptime"
desktop from having to reboot after install from a live disc.
More specifically, as par my other reply-
One possible implementation of USB-flash persistance involves the same
mechanisms vis-a-vis-
You might want to make the snapshot overlay device begin its life as a broken
mirror or extra-dm-layer device, so that the user may _optionally_ at some point
during the life-cycle of the boot session, choose to live-migrate their system
changes to a usb-flash device.
-dmc/jdog
--
Fedora-livecd-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-livecd-list
