Am Mi 12.Dezember 2007 schrieb Jeremy Katz: > On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 15:57 +0100, Sebastian Vahl wrote: > > I'm still unable to don't include firefox on a livecd (although the > > xulrunner/firefox conflict is resolved). I'm not even having an idea why > > it is included in my local spins. I've explicitely removed it from > > livecd-fedora-base-desktop.ks and livecd-fedora-kde.ks (with "-firefox") > > and it shouldn't be needed by any package (since xulrunner is there). I > > can easily remove it on a running livecd (or even with "--shell") and rpm > > is not complaining about dependencies then. > > > > firefox is installed right aside xulrunner, so I'm assuming it's maybe > > related to the provides from firefox (esp. gecko-libs). > > Are you explicitly listing xulrunner in your %packages section? If not > and if there's something depending on an unversioned gecko-libs, then > firefox could well be getting chosen as the shortest provider of > gecko-libs
No I haven't listed xulrunner (only as "-xulrunner") and don't even want this one (but that's another problem: #420101). So the next step is maybe: Figure out what is requirering the unversioned gecko-libs and file a bug against that package? Sebastian
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- Fedora-livecd-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-livecd-list
